I'm a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Universal Medicare Is the Top Solution for US Healthcare

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.

Michael Lopez
Michael Lopez

A seasoned gaming journalist with a passion for slots and casino trends, offering honest reviews and strategies.

Popular Post